Category talk:Ingame Help - Revision history

Marni: Removed bad images

2015-09-15T09:10:38Z

Removed bad images

Lainiwakura: /* If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section? */

2007-01-27T17:29:04Z

If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?

Lainiwakura: /* If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section? */

2007-01-27T17:27:47Z

If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?

Lainiwakura: /* If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section? */

2007-01-27T17:27:08Z

If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?

Manny: /* If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section? */

2007-01-27T08:33:27Z

If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?

Dashiva: /* If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section? */

2007-01-27T03:55:50Z

If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?

Jbobj at 00:44, 27 January 2007

2007-01-27T00:44:59Z

Dashiva at 10:45, 21 December 2006

2006-12-21T10:45:09Z

Lainiwakura: use templates?

2006-12-21T10:07:46Z

use templates?

New page

== Templates ==
Should articles in this category use templates or not, since the the client doesn't parse them? <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura|Lain Iwakura]] 04:07, 21 December 2006 (CST)</small>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Templates ==
-Should articles in this category use templates or not, since the the client doesn't parse them? <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura|Lain Iwakura]] 04:07, 21 December 2006 (CST)</small>
+Should articles in this category use templates or not, since the the client doesn't parse them? <small>--[[User:Lainiwakura|Lain Iwakura]] 04:07, 21 December 2006 (CST)</small>
 : Originally the pages were supposed to be plain text, but that ideal has long since been abandoned. The current system seems to be "as long as the raw wikitext is legible, use whatever you want". - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 04:45, 21 December 2006 (CST)
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)
-<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or [http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/khtml/ KDE's HTML Kpart] from C/C++ to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}}  <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>
+<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or [http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/khtml/ KDE's HTML Kpart] from C/C++ to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO.   <small>--[[User:Lainiwakura|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 27 January 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)		:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)

−	<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or KDE's HTML Kpart from C/C++ to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}} <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>	+	<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or [http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/khtml/ KDE's HTML Kpart] from C/C++ to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}} <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 27 January 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)		:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)

−	<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or KDE's HTML Kpart to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}} <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>	+	<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or KDE's HTML Kpart from C/C++ to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}} <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 27 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)		:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	<div>Yup, the client would need extensive coding work to fully support wiki pages, perhaps Notch would have to port an existing open-source renderer such as Gecko or KDE's HTML Kpart to Java... this probably won't happen since <em>animation</em> [should] be/is his biggest priority IMO. {{smiley}} <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 11:27, 27 January 2007 (CST)</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 27 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: The ingame help pages exist primarily because the client doesn't support proper HTML rendering. If we were to redirect everything, we would have to add plaintext summaries to pretty much all the pages, and remove them when proper rendering is in place. I don't have any strong opinion about either side personally. - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 21:55, 26 January 2007 (CST)		: The ingame help pages exist primarily because the client doesn't support proper HTML rendering. If we were to redirect everything, we would have to add plaintext summaries to pretty much all the pages, and remove them when proper rendering is in place. I don't have any strong opinion about either side personally. - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 21:55, 26 January 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:: I'm not fond of the double pages either, but there needs to be a lot more support of either wiki or html before merging them IMO. [[User:Manny\|Manny]] 02:33, 27 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 27 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I added a suggestion to let the client be able to parse the #REDIRECT command [http://www.wurmonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9291]. If this was added, we could merge this ingame help section with the rest of the Wiki.(ex. set item:hammer page to <nowiki>"#redirect [[Hammer]]"</nowiki>) I don't know about everyone else, but I was never that fond of having 2 separate articles on everything. I'd like to know others opinions about merging the sections if Redirects were added to the client. - [[User:Jbobj\|Jbobj]] 18:44, 26 January 2007 (CST)		I added a suggestion to let the client be able to parse the #REDIRECT command [http://www.wurmonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9291]. If this was added, we could merge this ingame help section with the rest of the Wiki.(ex. set item:hammer page to <nowiki>"#redirect [[Hammer]]"</nowiki>) I don't know about everyone else, but I was never that fond of having 2 separate articles on everything. I'd like to know others opinions about merging the sections if Redirects were added to the client. - [[User:Jbobj\|Jbobj]] 18:44, 26 January 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	: The ingame help pages exist primarily because the client doesn't support proper HTML rendering. If we were to redirect everything, we would have to add plaintext summaries to pretty much all the pages, and remove them when proper rendering is in place. I don't have any strong opinion about either side personally. - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 21:55, 26 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:44, 27 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: Originally the pages were supposed to be plain text, but that ideal has long since been abandoned. The current system seems to be "as long as the raw wikitext is legible, use whatever you want". - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 04:45, 21 December 2006 (CST)		: Originally the pages were supposed to be plain text, but that ideal has long since been abandoned. The current system seems to be "as long as the raw wikitext is legible, use whatever you want". - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 04:45, 21 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	==If Redirects were added to the client wiki parser, should we merge ingame help section?==
		+
		+	I added a suggestion to let the client be able to parse the #REDIRECT command [http://www.wurmonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9291]. If this was added, we could merge this ingame help section with the rest of the Wiki.(ex. set item:hammer page to <nowiki>"#redirect [[Hammer]]"</nowiki>) I don't know about everyone else, but I was never that fond of having 2 separate articles on everything. I'd like to know others opinions about merging the sections if Redirects were added to the client. - [[User:Jbobj\|Jbobj]] 18:44, 26 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 21 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Templates ==		== Templates ==
	Should articles in this category use templates or not, since the the client doesn't parse them? <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 04:07, 21 December 2006 (CST)</small>		Should articles in this category use templates or not, since the the client doesn't parse them? <small>--http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8964/duckieta2.gif[[User:Lainiwakura\|Lain Iwakura]] 04:07, 21 December 2006 (CST)</small>
		+
		+	: Originally the pages were supposed to be plain text, but that ideal has long since been abandoned. The current system seems to be "as long as the raw wikitext is legible, use whatever you want". - [[User:Dashiva\|Dashiva]] 04:45, 21 December 2006 (CST)