Guides talk:Tips for Skills - Revision history

Seedlings: Seedlings moved page Talk:Tips for Skills to Guides talk:Tips for Skills without leaving a redirect

2017-06-28T19:45:51Z

Seedlings moved page Talk:Tips for Skills to Guides talk:Tips for Skills without leaving a redirect

Vardoj at 17:49, 5 August 2011

2011-08-05T17:49:02Z

Tritus at 14:21, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T14:21:06Z

Tritus at 12:32, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T12:32:15Z

Tritus at 12:22, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T12:22:02Z

Tritus at 12:16, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T12:16:20Z

Tritus at 12:15, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T12:15:43Z

Silverhammers at 03:30, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T03:30:18Z

Silverhammers at 03:28, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T03:28:43Z

SchmendictV2 at 20:00, 3 January 2008

2008-01-03T20:00:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 5 August 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	# I felt that having an intermediate guide page would make it easier for people to add any specialised guides they wanted to add and that not categorising the final page un Guides would make the Guides category page a lot easier to navigate.		# I felt that having an intermediate guide page would make it easier for people to add any specialised guides they wanted to add and that not categorising the final page un Guides would make the Guides category page a lot easier to navigate.
	* [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 09:21, 16 June 2009 (CDT)		* [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 09:21, 16 June 2009 (CDT)
		+
		+	In the Digging section: "try not to keep your eye on the skillgain; trust me it seems like you get your skill up faster." - This is a completely ridiculous statement, it should be removed. --[[User:Vardoj\|Vardoj]] 17:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:21, 16 June 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This article is sketchy at best, inaccurate in places and seems to duplicate information available elsewhere. At best it should probably be cut up and spread over the various skill related pages. Ideally, each skill page might have a default link called, say, "<skillname> guides" and there might be a general page Guides with a full list of guides. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:32, 16 June 2009 (CDT)		This article is sketchy at best, inaccurate in places and seems to duplicate information available elsewhere. At best it should probably be cut up and spread over the various skill related pages. Ideally, each skill page might have a default link called, say, "<skillname> guides" and there might be a general page Guides with a full list of guides. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:32, 16 June 2009 (CDT)
		+
		+	# I copied nearly all content on this page to individual pages associated with the relevant skill. I did not copy a couple of sections that seemed to be duplicating info easily available elsewhere.
		+	# The relevant skill pages should now have a subsect called "Guides" with a single link to "<skillname> Guide", which are categorised under Guides and Babel/<initial letter of skillname>
		+	# Those pages have links to "<skillname> Skill Tips", which are categorised only under Babel/<initial letter of skillname>
		+	# EG Mining (Guides section) -> Mining Guide -> Mining Skill Tips
		+	# I felt that having an intermediate guide page would make it easier for people to add any specialised guides they wanted to add and that not categorising the final page un Guides would make the Guides category page a lot easier to navigate.
		+	* [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 09:21, 16 June 2009 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 16 June 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:16, 16 June 2009 (CDT)		CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:16, 16 June 2009 (CDT)

−	This article is sketchy at best, inaccurate in places and seems to duplicate information available elsewhere. At best it should probably be cut up and spread over the various skill related pages.	+	This article is sketchy at best, inaccurate in places and seems to duplicate information available elsewhere. At best it should probably be cut up and spread over the various skill related pages. Ideally, each skill page might have a default link called, say, "<skillname> guides" and there might be a general page Guides with a full list of guides. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:32, 16 June 2009 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 16 June 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:16, 16 June 2009 (CDT)		CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:16, 16 June 2009 (CDT)
		+
		+	This article is sketchy at best, inaccurate in places and seems to duplicate information available elsewhere. At best it should probably be cut up and spread over the various skill related pages.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 16 June 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?--[[User:Silverhammers\|Silverhammers]] 22:30, 1 April 2009 (CDT)		In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?--[[User:Silverhammers\|Silverhammers]] 22:30, 1 April 2009 (CDT)

−	CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik.	+	CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik. [[User:Tritus\|Tritus]] 07:16, 16 June 2009 (CDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:45, 28 June 2017
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 16 June 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?--[[User:Silverhammers\|Silverhammers]] 22:30, 1 April 2009 (CDT)		In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?--[[User:Silverhammers\|Silverhammers]] 22:30, 1 April 2009 (CDT)
		+
		+	CoC on anvils works for the creation process, so it would increase locksmithing skill afaik.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 2 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Is the contributions section really necessary? I think it should be deleted. [[User:SchmendictV2\|SchmendictV2]] 14:00, 3 January 2008 (CST)		Is the contributions section really necessary? I think it should be deleted. [[User:SchmendictV2\|SchmendictV2]] 14:00, 3 January 2008 (CST)

−	In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?	+	In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?--[[User:Silverhammers\|Silverhammers]] 22:30, 1 April 2009 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 2 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Is the contributions section really necessary? I think it should be deleted. [[User:SchmendictV2\|SchmendictV2]] 14:00, 3 January 2008 (CST)		Is the contributions section really necessary? I think it should be deleted. [[User:SchmendictV2\|SchmendictV2]] 14:00, 3 January 2008 (CST)
		+
		+	In the locksmithing section it mentions putting COC on a small anvil. I was under the impression that coc only works on an activated item. If so, wouldn't coc on an anvil be a wasted effort?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 3 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Actually Tigiot does have a point. Contributions, edits, and outright changes to pages are already tracked by the Wiki, not to mention individual contributions per user/player. --[[User:Klaa\|Klaa]] 17:22, 5 December 2007 (CST)		Actually Tigiot does have a point. Contributions, edits, and outright changes to pages are already tracked by the Wiki, not to mention individual contributions per user/player. --[[User:Klaa\|Klaa]] 17:22, 5 December 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	Is the contributions section really necessary? I think it should be deleted. [[User:SchmendictV2\|SchmendictV2]] 14:00, 3 January 2008 (CST)