Talk:Analyse - Revision history

Veryth: /* Analyse with different ore veins */ faint traces sandstone on WU - needs confirmation

2019-03-26T10:46:03Z

Analyse with different ore veins: faint traces sandstone on WU - needs confirmation

Seedlings: moved unconfirmed info from the main page to talk

2017-04-21T12:20:04Z

moved unconfirmed info from the main page to talk

Tathar: /* Analyse with different ore veins */

2016-02-16T20:05:28Z

Analyse with different ore veins

Tathar: /* Analyse with different ore veins */ new section

2016-02-16T19:50:14Z

Analyse with different ore veins: new section

Skyefox: /* Skill requirement to get vein quality */

2014-01-04T18:39:44Z

Skill requirement to get vein quality

Skyefox: /* Skill requirement to get vein quality */

2014-01-04T18:38:02Z

Skill requirement to get vein quality

Chromega: /* Indistinct trace */ Bit more info

2013-07-19T03:30:00Z

Indistinct trace: Bit more info

Chromega: Indistinct trace found

2013-07-19T03:05:03Z

Indistinct trace found

Ago at 05:20, 8 July 2013

2013-07-08T05:20:35Z

Ago at 10:37, 7 July 2013

2013-07-07T10:37:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 26 March 2019
Line 118:		Line 118:
	(tables up to date before game update 14 april 2017)		(tables up to date before game update 14 april 2017)
	after that update you will see ql of vein, if you will see presence of it(tested on 2 characters at 60 and 99,75 prospecting)		after that update you will see ql of vein, if you will see presence of it(tested on 2 characters at 60 and 99,75 prospecting)
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	I just found that faint traces of Sandstone seem to be unlocked at Prospecting 47, but it was on WU so needs confirmation on WO.
		+
		+	[20:32:59] You notice a faint trace of something, but cannot quite make it out (south of east).
		+	[20:33:01] Prospecting increased by 0.0113 to 47.0022
		+	[20:33:08] You spot a faint trace of good quality sandstone (south of east).
		+
		+	[[User:Veryth\|Veryth]] ([[User talk:Veryth\|talk]]) 11:46, 26 March 2019 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 21 April 2017
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|}		\|}
	--[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 21:05, 16 February 2016 (CET)		--[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 21:05, 16 February 2016 (CET)
		+
		+	--------------------
		+
		+	Kgorski's discovered info:
		+
		+
		+	more detailed table with prospecting skill needed to view '''quality of ore''' : (fileds with "?" are unconfirmed, fields with "-" are still unavailable at 99,746140 prospecting)
		+
		+	{\| border=1 style="text-align:center;"
		+	\|-
		+	! resource type !! iron !! tin !! zinc !! lead !! copper !! slate !! silver !! marble !! gold !! rocksalt
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Traces (1 tile) \|\| 22 \|\| 24 \|\| 24 \|\| 25 \|\| 26 \|\| 28 \|\| 29 \|\| 30 \|\| 31 \|\| 22?
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Slight traces (2 tiles) \|\| 40 \|\| 41 \|\| 42 \|\| 43 \|\| 44 \|\| 46 \|\| 47 \|\| 48 \|\| 49 \|\| 40?
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Faint traces (3 tiles) \|\| 58 \|\| 59 \|\| 60 \|\| 61 \|\| 62 \|\| 64 \|\| 65 \|\| 66 \|\| 67 \|\| 58
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Minuscule traces (4 tiles) \|\| 76 \|\| 77 \|\| 78 \|\| 79 \|\| 80 \|\| 82 \|\| 83 \|\| 84 \|\| 85 \|\| 76?
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Vague traces (5 tiles) \|\| 94 \|\| 95 \|\| 96 \|\| 97 \|\| 98 \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| 94?
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Indistinct traces (6 tiles) \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| - \|\| -
		+	\|-
		+	\|}
		+
		+	(tables up to date before game update 14 april 2017)
		+	after that update you will see ql of vein, if you will see presence of it(tested on 2 characters at 60 and 99,75 prospecting)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 16 February 2016
Line 69:		Line 69:

	Looks like different vein types have different points when they unlock information in Analyse. That will complicate things a bit, but if we restructure the table accordingly, we should be fine. --[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (CET)		Looks like different vein types have different points when they unlock information in Analyse. That will complicate things a bit, but if we restructure the table accordingly, we should be fine. --[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (CET)
		+
		+	I'll start with a table for silver, since I just got good info in WU that ore type becomes visible at 41.9 skill.
		+	{\| border=1 style="text-align:center;"
		+	! colspan='4'\| Silver
		+	\|-
		+	! Distance !! Ore presence !! Ore type !! Ore quality
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Traces (1 tile) \|\| 20 \|\| ?? \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Slight traces (2 tiles) \|\| 20 \|\| ?? \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Faint traces (3 tiles) \|\| ~34 \|\| 41.9 \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Minuscule traces (4 tiles) \|\| ~51 \|\| ?? \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Vague traces (5 tiles) \|\| ~70 \|\| ?? \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|\| Indistinct traces (6 tiles) \|\| ~85 \|\| ?? \|\| ??
		+	\|-
		+	\|}
		+	--[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 21:05, 16 February 2016 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 16 February 2016
Line 65:		Line 65:
	[19:57:58] You see a indistinct trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.		[19:57:58] You see a indistinct trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.
	[19:57:58] You finish analysing the shard.		[19:57:58] You finish analysing the shard.
		+
		+	== Analyse with different ore veins ==
		+
		+	Looks like different vein types have different points when they unlock information in Analyse. That will complicate things a bit, but if we restructure the table accordingly, we should be fine. --[[User:Tathar\|Tathar]] ([[User talk:Tathar\|talk]]) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 4 January 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:

	The skill requriement depends on the ore type too. At 62 prospecting silver quality could not be detected at 3 tiles but iron worked. At 68 silver quality was detectable at 3 tiles too. --[[User:Ago\|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago\|talk]]) 12:37, 7 July 2013 (CEST)		The skill requriement depends on the ore type too. At 62 prospecting silver quality could not be detected at 3 tiles but iron worked. At 68 silver quality was detectable at 3 tiles too. --[[User:Ago\|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago\|talk]]) 12:37, 7 July 2013 (CEST)
		+
	I have 27 prospecting and was not given a ql report on the slight trace of ore --~ {{User:Skyefox\|Skyefox]] January 4, 2014		I have 27 prospecting and was not given a ql report on the slight trace of ore --~ {{User:Skyefox\|Skyefox]] January 4, 2014

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 The skill requriement depends on the ore type too. At 62 prospecting silver quality could not be detected at 3 tiles but iron worked. At 68 silver quality was detectable at 3 tiles too. --[[User:Ago|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago|talk]]) 12:37, 7 July 2013 (CEST)
+I have 27 prospecting and was not given a ql report on the slight trace of ore --~ {{User:Skyefox|Skyefox]] January 4, 2014
 == Skill required for analysis ==

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 I am currently sitting at 86.73 prospecting and analyzed a rock shard with a 70ql pick and a 1ql pick after. Just received this. Looks like we have another tile away we can see.
 -- [[User:Chromega|Chromega]] ([[User talk:Chromega|talk]]) 05:05, 19 July 2013 (CEST)
   [19:57:40] You start to analyse the shard.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 19 July 2013
Line 40:		Line 40:
	[16:09:08] You spot a vague trace of tin ore.		[16:09:08] You spot a vague trace of tin ore.
	[16:09:08] You see a vague trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.		[16:09:08] You see a vague trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.
		+
		+	== Indistinct trace ==
		+
		+	I am currently sitting at 86.73 prospecting and analyzed a rock shard with a 70ql pick and a 1ql pick after. Just received this. Looks like we have another tile away we can see.
		+	-- [[User:Chromega\|Chromega]] ([[User talk:Chromega\|talk]]) 05:05, 19 July 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	[19:57:40] You start to analyse the shard.
		+	[19:57:40] Lots of different sized rock shards.
		+	[19:57:42] You cannot see anything unusual.
		+	[19:57:42] You take a closer look.
		+	[19:57:45] You cannot see any unusual slight traces of anything.
		+	[19:57:45] You study it a bit more.
		+	[19:57:48] You cannot see anything unusual.
		+	[19:57:48] You study it real hard.
		+	[19:57:51] You spot a minuscule trace of acceptable quality iron ore.
		+	[19:57:51] You peer at it.
		+	[19:57:54] You see a vague trace of flint.
		+	[19:57:54] You spot a vague trace of iron ore.
		+	[19:57:54] You go cross-eyed studying it.
		+	[19:57:58] You see a indistinct trace of iron ore.
		+	[19:57:58] You see a indistinct trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.
		+	[19:57:58] You finish analysing the shard.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 8 July 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Between 62 and 68 skill the ability to detect "something" at 5 tiles appeared. --[[User:Ago\|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago\|talk]]) 12:37, 7 July 2013 (CEST)		Between 62 and 68 skill the ability to detect "something" at 5 tiles appeared. --[[User:Ago\|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago\|talk]]) 12:37, 7 July 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	At 70 skill you can detect iron, tin up to 5 tiles but not silver. --[[User:Ago\|Ago]] ([[User talk:Ago\|talk]]) 07:20, 8 July 2013 (CEST)
		+	[15:56:24] You peer at it.
		+	[15:56:27] You see a vague trace of iron ore.
		+	[15:56:27] You see a vague trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.
		+	[16:09:05] You peer at it.
		+	[16:09:08] You spot a vague trace of tin ore.
		+	[16:09:08] You see a vague trace of something, but cannot quite make it out.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 I know I had it at 25ish prospecting when the update came. Have you gotten any farther along yet?
 [[User:Asera|Asera]] ([[User talk:Asera|talk]]) 09:04, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
@@ Line 28: / Line 30: @@
 Skills: Prospecting 34.72 , Mining 52.92 [[User:Pottedfrog|Pottedfrog]] 1 July 2013