https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AEmpirical_Evaluation_of_Fences 2026-06-08T16:05:17Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.33.0 https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Empirical_Evaluation_of_Fences&diff=57530&oldid=prev 2010-07-27T16:43:41Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 16:43, 27 July 2010</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2" >Line 2:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Secondly, it would also be a useful addition to the 'evaluation' to measure/test the 'repairing success/failures' on the wall/fence types (bearing in mind that successful repairs will also reduce decay by 10 on stone walls and 40 on fences etc) In the interest of fairness, the same quality materials should be used for repair works across the board. Repairing fences seems to more than make up for their ever-so-slightly faster decay rate and in my experience seems to fail less often than trying to repair a stone wall. --[[User:Zhuyi|Zhuyi]] 16:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Secondly, it would also be a useful addition to the 'evaluation' to measure/test the 'repairing success/failures' on the wall/fence types (bearing in mind that successful repairs will also reduce decay by 10 on stone walls and 40 on fences etc) In the interest of fairness, the same quality materials should be used for repair works across the board. Repairing fences seems to more than make up for their ever-so-slightly faster decay rate and in my experience seems to fail less often than trying to repair a stone wall. --[[User:Zhuyi|Zhuyi]] 16:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">This shows wooden fences is better than the rest. Would personally continue until the end, because majority of my 21ql small fences long decayed before my 21ql tall stone walls does in GV. --[[User:Xsamuraizx|Xsamuraizx]] 16:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Xsamuraizx https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Empirical_Evaluation_of_Fences&diff=57528&oldid=prev 2010-07-27T16:37:18Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 16:37, 27 July 2010</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Is this a chart of damage the fences took over time?  If so it should be labelled as such.  --[[User:Maluraq|Maluraq]] 01:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Is this a chart of damage the fences took over time?  If so it should be labelled as such.  --[[User:Maluraq|Maluraq]] 01:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Secondly, it would also be a useful addition to the 'evaluation' to measure/test the 'repairing success/failures' on the wall/fence types (bearing in mind that successful repairs will also reduce decay by 10 on stone walls and 40 on fences etc) In the interest of fairness, the same quality materials should be used for repair works across the board. Repairing fences seems to more than make up for their ever-so-slightly faster decay rate and in my experience seems to fail less often than trying to repair a stone wall. --[[User:Zhuyi|Zhuyi]] 16:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Zhuyi https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Empirical_Evaluation_of_Fences&diff=56889&oldid=prev 2010-06-12T01:40:39Z

<p>Q for author</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Is this a chart of damage the fences took over time? If so it should be labelled as such. --[[User:Maluraq|Maluraq]] 01:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)</div>

Maluraq