Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oak"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Cleaning up red links, no other changes) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST) | I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST) | ||
| − | : On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page | + | : On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page Silent Hill|here. |
: There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - [[User:EliasTheCrimson|EliasTheCrimson]] 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST) | : There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - [[User:EliasTheCrimson|EliasTheCrimson]] 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 8 December 2020
I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - Dashiva 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST)
- On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page Silent Hill|here.
- There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - EliasTheCrimson 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST)
- Does it happen in all directions? My oak left trees intact to the north and east, but didn't have any to kill south and west. Perhaps there's a corner issue or something similar that makes the kill area non-centered. - Dashiva 08:43, 23 February 2009 (CST)
- I can confirm your results Dashiva, my oak trees only seem to kill trees within 1 tile of themselves, not 2. --Telarin 20:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
