Difference between revisions of "Settlement talk:Shadow Requiem"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Siege7|Siege7]] 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST) | --[[User:Siege7|Siege7]] 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| − | Depends on how one defines a victory. By WL standards it was a smashing success (literally). In any case, taking away over 16 silver in a single drain is decent. --[[User:Klaa|Klaa]] 18:59, 5 December 2007 (CST) | + | Depends on how one defines a victory. By WL standards it was a smashing success (literally). In any case, taking away over 16 silver in a single drain is decent. Doing it before the disband to deprieve the holder makes it even better --[[User:Klaa|Klaa]] 18:59, 5 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 02:00, 6 December 2007
Ive have seen similar statements on even WL raid logs. Show some restraint or at least respect for other people's town pages.
http://www.wurmonline.com/wiki/index.php?title=Shadow_Requiem&curid=5419&diff=29357&oldid=29354
--Klaa 16:25, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Never meant to imply it was the reason it disbanded, we all knew it wasn't. If anything, was trying to show it as more of a hollow victory seeing as it was essentially abandoned at that point.
--Siege7 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Depends on how one defines a victory. By WL standards it was a smashing success (literally). In any case, taking away over 16 silver in a single drain is decent. Doing it before the disband to deprieve the holder makes it even better --Klaa 18:59, 5 December 2007 (CST)
