Difference between revisions of "Talk:Animal conditions"
(copy and edit other article for ingame use) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The table someone added looks nice and all, and correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't they completely unreadable in-game? I remember requesting removal of one of those for settlement info a long time ago. [[Player:Aeris|Aeris]] 17:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | The table someone added looks nice and all, and correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't they completely unreadable in-game? I remember requesting removal of one of those for settlement info a long time ago. [[Player:Aeris|Aeris]] 17:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | Please have a look at [[:Category:Ingame | + | Please have a look at [[:Category:Ingame Help]]. Articles meant for easy reading ingame are usually preceded by "Item:" or something similar. I suggest articles like this one that doesn't really fit any of those options are simply copied to one preceded by "Ingame:", which then is edited for ingame use. This way everyone can have what they want. [[User:Arvid|Arvid]] 18:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:06, 5 May 2010
I understand the value in coloring the conditions, but don't do so at the expense of being able to read the text. -KinoftheFlames 20:00, 29 November 2009 (CST)
Removed the tags on popular demand. The conditions are already listed alphabetically, should be enough Aeris 07:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The table someone added looks nice and all, and correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't they completely unreadable in-game? I remember requesting removal of one of those for settlement info a long time ago. Aeris 17:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Please have a look at Category:Ingame Help. Articles meant for easy reading ingame are usually preceded by "Item:" or something similar. I suggest articles like this one that doesn't really fit any of those options are simply copied to one preceded by "Ingame:", which then is edited for ingame use. This way everyone can have what they want. Arvid 18:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
