Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item"
(reason for reverting the image file format in the template to use png again instead) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The portable network graphics format has been used throughout the wiki, they're of good image quality and moderate file size if the [[images]] are saved correctly. I can't see a lot of jpeg format files being uploaded any time soon. A consistent transition would be if the existing png image files were converted and uploaded in advance instead. But then again, for what reason? --[[User:Ulviirala|Ulviirala]] 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | The portable network graphics format has been used throughout the wiki, they're of good image quality and moderate file size if the [[images]] are saved correctly. I can't see a lot of jpeg format files being uploaded any time soon. A consistent transition would be if the existing png image files were converted and uploaded in advance instead. But then again, for what reason? --[[User:Ulviirala|Ulviirala]] 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I changed it based on the following correspondence with MrBloodworth: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Quote from: Arvid on 11 May 2010, 06:54:47 | ||
| + | ''How about I make the preferred image format = jpg? Isn't that usually better with regard to the size of the images/screenshots we normally need? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''MrBloodworth: Yes, its is the preferred image type for web images and photographs. PNG limits the colors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think MrBloodworth has also mentioned something about providing rendered (outside the game) images like he did with the new streetlamps. I was sort of waiting for that (taking in mind that he's busy with other jobs too). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also I feel many of the images allready on the wiki are too dark and that the items in them doesn't really stand out too well from the background. I many cases I find myself having to strain my eyes a bit much to see what's actually in them (especially regarding the thumbnails). I'd appreciate if contributors would make an effort to provide screenshots taken in bright daylight and where appropriate with sand or similar as background. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If people really feel like, of course we could change the image format back. [[User:Arvid|Arvid]] 12:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 25 May 2010
Anyone objecting to renaming this template to "Crafted" or "Craftable", since crafted items is what it really is about. My brain keeps demanding that I do it... Arvid 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Also I'd really like to rename the categories of "Blacksmithing items" and "Carpentry items" etc. to "Blacksmithing products" and "Carpentry products" etc. Arvid 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Bump
If I do not see any objections I will make a mess of this wiki Arvid 03:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- No objections --Manny 08:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Image file format
Why did you make the image file format default to JPG? There are next to none jpeg format image files, if any, at least I can't find any File entries in the history for the past 30 days / 500 entries. Resulting in disabling any item template on the wiki showing an image.
The portable network graphics format has been used throughout the wiki, they're of good image quality and moderate file size if the images are saved correctly. I can't see a lot of jpeg format files being uploaded any time soon. A consistent transition would be if the existing png image files were converted and uploaded in advance instead. But then again, for what reason? --Ulviirala 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I changed it based on the following correspondence with MrBloodworth:
Quote from: Arvid on 11 May 2010, 06:54:47 How about I make the preferred image format = jpg? Isn't that usually better with regard to the size of the images/screenshots we normally need?
MrBloodworth: Yes, its is the preferred image type for web images and photographs. PNG limits the colors.
I think MrBloodworth has also mentioned something about providing rendered (outside the game) images like he did with the new streetlamps. I was sort of waiting for that (taking in mind that he's busy with other jobs too).
Also I feel many of the images allready on the wiki are too dark and that the items in them doesn't really stand out too well from the background. I many cases I find myself having to strain my eyes a bit much to see what's actually in them (especially regarding the thumbnails). I'd appreciate if contributors would make an effort to provide screenshots taken in bright daylight and where appropriate with sand or similar as background.
If people really feel like, of course we could change the image format back. Arvid 12:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
