Difference between revisions of "Empirical Evaluation of Fences"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== [[User:Systemparadox|SystemParadox]]'s Empirical Evaluation of Fences ==
 
 
 
Aim: To answer once and for all the age-old question: which fence type to build?
 
Aim: To answer once and for all the age-old question: which fence type to build?
  
Line 12: Line 10:
 
Wooden fences and stone walls are easy to build. Palisades, while hard to obtain material for, are not noticably more difficult to build. Tall stone walls take an immediate penalty because even with 20 masonry the success rate for attaching bricks is less than 20%. Past experience shows that they are similarly hard to repair. Bricks aren't exactly easy to make either.
 
Wooden fences and stone walls are easy to build. Palisades, while hard to obtain material for, are not noticably more difficult to build. Tall stone walls take an immediate penalty because even with 20 masonry the success rate for attaching bricks is less than 20%. Past experience shows that they are similarly hard to repair. Bricks aren't exactly easy to make either.
  
=== Results ===
+
== Results ==

Revision as of 20:12, 9 June 2010

Aim: To answer once and for all the age-old question: which fence type to build?

All 4 fences were created on Golden Valley at 20:00 09/06/2010 (UTC+1), using 20QL components and 20 carpentry/masonry skill, resulting in 21QL fences.

Wooden fences and stone walls are easy to build. Palisades, while hard to obtain material for, are not noticably more difficult to build. Tall stone walls take an immediate penalty because even with 20 masonry the success rate for attaching bricks is less than 20%. Past experience shows that they are similarly hard to repair. Bricks aren't exactly easy to make either.

Results