Difference between revisions of "Settlement talk:Shadow Requiem"
m (Keenan moved page Talk:Shadow Requiem to Settlement talk:Shadow Requiem: Moving to settlement namespace.) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:Siege7|Siege7]] 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST) | --[[User:Siege7|Siege7]] 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Depends on how one defines a victory. By WL standards it was a smashing success (literally). In any case, taking away over 16 silver in a single drain is decent. Doing it before the disband to deprieve the holder makes it even better --[[User:Klaa|Klaa]] 18:59, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | IS posted stuff about the Asgard raid on their page when they drained roughly 10 seconds before it disbanded. They still made out that it was an epic victory on their part. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The IS wiki page said nothing of epic victory. It pretty clear it was moved purposely. The simple 6 hour/1.5 minutes after it disbands suffices and doesn't imply much. | ||
| + | [[User:Jbobj|Jbobj]] 22:13, 6 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for the neutral input, Jbobj. I thought the same thing, but it apparently ruffled SOMEONE'S feathers, so I went with a more stripped down version. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Siege7|Siege7]] 22:45, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:20, 8 August 2015
Ive have seen similar statements on even WL raid logs. Show some restraint or at least respect for other people's town pages.
http://www.wurmonline.com/wiki/index.php?title=Shadow_Requiem&curid=5419&diff=29357&oldid=29354
--Klaa 16:25, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Never meant to imply it was the reason it disbanded, we all knew it wasn't. If anything, was trying to show it as more of a hollow victory seeing as it was essentially abandoned at that point.
--Siege7 18:15, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Depends on how one defines a victory. By WL standards it was a smashing success (literally). In any case, taking away over 16 silver in a single drain is decent. Doing it before the disband to deprieve the holder makes it even better --Klaa 18:59, 5 December 2007 (CST)
IS posted stuff about the Asgard raid on their page when they drained roughly 10 seconds before it disbanded. They still made out that it was an epic victory on their part.
The IS wiki page said nothing of epic victory. It pretty clear it was moved purposely. The simple 6 hour/1.5 minutes after it disbands suffices and doesn't imply much. Jbobj 22:13, 6 December 2007 (CST)
Thanks for the neutral input, Jbobj. I thought the same thing, but it apparently ruffled SOMEONE'S feathers, so I went with a more stripped down version.
--Siege7 22:45, 7 December 2007 (CST)
