Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tool"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Stika 1|Stika 1]] 18:57, 3 October 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Stika 1|Stika 1]] 18:57, 3 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : If a tool is missing from a page then you add it, that's all there is to it. New tools are extremely rare so the lists are almost completely static. The concept of "tools" isn't well-defined anyway, so the focus should be on what items are relevant to a given skill. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 19:21, 3 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 4 October 2007
I think there needs to be a complete tool list for each creation catorgory, with a subcatorgory for what tools it will ask for to improve a finished / unfinished item. but thats just me so i thought id suggest it here first. Stika 1 00:15, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
- Skill pages list the tools the skill uses, isn't that enough? - Dashiva 02:25, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
Does it? where is trowel then, other than in smithing.
it wasn't until i was actually looking for a trowel in masonry that i realised it wasn't there(in masonary). hence the need for the list. if after its created, if we find the missing pages then those pages can be created. after all the tools have there own places, like how their made and a second page, for where they are used. then maybe we can get rid of the tool list.
i still think having a complete list in one spot is a good idea though(maybe sub catagorised). but thats why i chose to talk about it rather than just going ahead and doing it. i thought a discussion on weather we should do it would be a more benificial at this stage.
Stika 1 18:57, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
- If a tool is missing from a page then you add it, that's all there is to it. New tools are extremely rare so the lists are almost completely static. The concept of "tools" isn't well-defined anyway, so the focus should be on what items are relevant to a given skill. - Dashiva 19:21, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
