Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mind logic"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Table time)
(Error correction)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Table time! I've added my chars and Elias below, Xallo needs to clarify if his numbers are 1+3/4 or 3/4 total. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 05:51, 12 September 2008 (CDT)
 
Table time! I've added my chars and Elias below, Xallo needs to clarify if his numbers are 1+3/4 or 3/4 total. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 05:51, 12 September 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
Added my value as well, 27.30 mind logic, 1 active and 2 queued. [[User:Revelation|Revelation]]
 +
 +
Looks rather logical (no pun intended) that it is 1 extra queue for each started 10 ML, doesn't it? Keeping my exact stat to myself, but it's over 30 and I got 4 queues as well. --[[User:Steffel|Steffe]] 22:16, 12 September 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
I have 40.32 ML and 1 + 4 actions with my high level skills.  Will check some <50 skills for comparison [[User:Urman|Urman]] 23:09, 23 September 2008 (CDT)
  
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"
 
! Mind logic !! Actions (active + queued)
 
! Mind logic !! Actions (active + queued)
 +
|-
 +
| 19.50 || 1 + 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 19.90 || 1 + 2
 
| 19.90 || 1 + 2
 +
|-
 +
| 20.36 || 1 + 2
 +
|-
 +
| 26.78 || 1 + 2
 +
|-
 +
| 27.30 || 1 + 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 31.15 || 1 + 3
 
| 31.15 || 1 + 3
 +
|-
 +
| 31.49 || 1 + 3
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 35.74 || 1 + 3
 
| 35.74 || 1 + 3
 +
|-
 +
| 40.31 || 1 + 4
 +
|-
 +
| 43 || 1 + 4
 +
|}
 +
 +
Indeed, it seems that it's +1 action pr. 10 mind logic, starting at 20. So 2 actions at sub-20, 3 at 20+, 4 at 30+ and 5 at 40+. Logic then concludes that it's 6 at 50+, 7 at 60+, 8 at 70+, 9 at 80+ and 10 at 90+.
 +
 +
So, in summary:
 +
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"
 +
! Mind Logic
 +
! Action que
 +
|-
 +
|sub-29,99
 +
|3
 +
|-
 +
|30-39,99
 +
|4
 +
|-
 +
|40-49,99
 +
|5
 +
|-
 +
|50-59,99
 +
|6
 +
|-
 +
|60-69,99
 +
|7
 +
|-
 +
|70-79,99
 +
|8
 +
|-
 +
|80-89,99
 +
|9
 +
|-
 +
|90-99,99
 +
|10
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
[[User:Miggy|Miggy]] 06:34, 13 September 2008 (CDT) Miggy
 +
 +
== Speculation ==
 +
 +
Okay, I checked with a player who has 43 mind logic, and their queue is '''still''' 1 + 3. Can we try to restrain ourselves now? - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 05:30, 23 September 2008 (CDT)
 +
: Ack, turns out there was a miscommunication. It was 1+4 after all. My bad. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 04:38, 24 September 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 10:38, 24 September 2008

I have 28.83 Logic, and I have a 3 max queue. A village mate has 4 with 38 Logic. Any other updates? Xallo.

I've got 4 (1 performing and 3 on queue) with 31.15 mind logic. EliasTheCrimson 01:08, 12 September 2008 (CDT)

Table time! I've added my chars and Elias below, Xallo needs to clarify if his numbers are 1+3/4 or 3/4 total. - Dashiva 05:51, 12 September 2008 (CDT)

Added my value as well, 27.30 mind logic, 1 active and 2 queued. Revelation

Looks rather logical (no pun intended) that it is 1 extra queue for each started 10 ML, doesn't it? Keeping my exact stat to myself, but it's over 30 and I got 4 queues as well. --Steffe 22:16, 12 September 2008 (CDT)

I have 40.32 ML and 1 + 4 actions with my high level skills. Will check some <50 skills for comparison Urman 23:09, 23 September 2008 (CDT)

Mind logic Actions (active + queued)
19.50 1 + 2
19.90 1 + 2
20.36 1 + 2
26.78 1 + 2
27.30 1 + 2
31.15 1 + 3
31.49 1 + 3
35.74 1 + 3
40.31 1 + 4
43 1 + 4

Indeed, it seems that it's +1 action pr. 10 mind logic, starting at 20. So 2 actions at sub-20, 3 at 20+, 4 at 30+ and 5 at 40+. Logic then concludes that it's 6 at 50+, 7 at 60+, 8 at 70+, 9 at 80+ and 10 at 90+.

So, in summary:

Mind Logic Action que
sub-29,99 3
30-39,99 4
40-49,99 5
50-59,99 6
60-69,99 7
70-79,99 8
80-89,99 9
90-99,99 10

Miggy 06:34, 13 September 2008 (CDT) Miggy

Speculation

Okay, I checked with a player who has 43 mind logic, and their queue is still 1 + 3. Can we try to restrain ourselves now? - Dashiva 05:30, 23 September 2008 (CDT)

Ack, turns out there was a miscommunication. It was 1+4 after all. My bad. - Dashiva 04:38, 24 September 2008 (CDT)