Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hot food cooking"
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This is turning into a page where people can describe a slightly different process for cooking and post their name up as if they made a guide... | This is turning into a page where people can describe a slightly different process for cooking and post their name up as if they made a guide... | ||
I propose the guides be refferenced by links like 90% of the other pages on the wiki... | I propose the guides be refferenced by links like 90% of the other pages on the wiki... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Checked in here to say I cleaned the page up by moving the guides to separate pages. Wasn't aware of the "popular demand" for it, but guess that was an added bonus! [[User:Aeris|Aeris]] 01:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Cleaned the page, seemed someone had cluttered it up with unnecessarily long sentences. Short sentences promote readability. Noticed this as well: | ||
| + | *"A campire will raise the difficulty by 5*(nr_of_unique_ingredients-1), eg 2 meats + 1 onion counts for difficulty only as 2 ingredients" | ||
| + | ^ The above makes no sense to me. This was not how it was working with meals the last time I did cooking so I removed it. The formula makes it look like all ingredients have the same difficulty impact on the dish and that they have a relation to the fireplace it's cooked in. If it is true for some other dish I don't know but it shouldn't be listed in the general hot food cooking wiki anyhow. | ||
| + | [[User:Aeris|Aeris]] ([[User talk:Aeris|talk]]) 19:48, 13 October 2012 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why does someone keep adding the formula again? It doesn't make sense, all unique items you add to a dish don't have the same value and some items even turn the dish into a completely different one. I'd like an explanation to it or I'll remove it again as it doesn't make sense. [[User:Aeris|Aeris]] ([[User talk:Aeris|talk]]) 21:35, 5 December 2012 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I added a note to clarify, finally... ;) -[[User:Grimbark|Grimbark]] ([[User talk:Grimbark|talk]]) 08:41, 10 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:41, 10 September 2013
Well Ill be... never thought of using pig food in cooking --Klaa 20:18, 21 June 2008 (CDT)
How about a own cooking guide page? --Beneldorla 08:09, 9 November 2008 (CST)
How about changing the food articles in accordance to the new food system? I.E making it clear that all food types feed to 100%, and instead emphasize on the nutritional value of the food item instead of the food bar. More?
This is turning into a page where people can describe a slightly different process for cooking and post their name up as if they made a guide... I propose the guides be refferenced by links like 90% of the other pages on the wiki...
Checked in here to say I cleaned the page up by moving the guides to separate pages. Wasn't aware of the "popular demand" for it, but guess that was an added bonus! Aeris 01:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Cleaned the page, seemed someone had cluttered it up with unnecessarily long sentences. Short sentences promote readability. Noticed this as well:
- "A campire will raise the difficulty by 5*(nr_of_unique_ingredients-1), eg 2 meats + 1 onion counts for difficulty only as 2 ingredients"
^ The above makes no sense to me. This was not how it was working with meals the last time I did cooking so I removed it. The formula makes it look like all ingredients have the same difficulty impact on the dish and that they have a relation to the fireplace it's cooked in. If it is true for some other dish I don't know but it shouldn't be listed in the general hot food cooking wiki anyhow. Aeris (talk) 19:48, 13 October 2012 (CDT)
Why does someone keep adding the formula again? It doesn't make sense, all unique items you add to a dish don't have the same value and some items even turn the dish into a completely different one. I'd like an explanation to it or I'll remove it again as it doesn't make sense. Aeris (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2012 (CST)
