Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(WurmPedia:) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Technically they are stubs, but it is true they're rather unlikely to be extended, and the value would be low. I'll fire up the bot if there are no objections to de-stubbing. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 03:44, 28 July 2007 (CDT) | : Technically they are stubs, but it is true they're rather unlikely to be extended, and the value would be low. I'll fire up the bot if there are no objections to de-stubbing. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 03:44, 28 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == WurmPedia: == | ||
| + | |||
| + | All the stubs in the W section are pretty much useless. Should they be nominated for deletion? -[[User:Mojo|Mojo]] 17:49, 13 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:49, 14 January 2008
Should abandoned villages and users really be put under "category:stub"? Doesn't feel like they belong here. --Steffe 17:20, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Technically they are stubs, but it is true they're rather unlikely to be extended, and the value would be low. I'll fire up the bot if there are no objections to de-stubbing. - Dashiva 03:44, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
WurmPedia:
All the stubs in the W section are pretty much useless. Should they be nominated for deletion? -Mojo 17:49, 13 January 2008 (CST)
