Difference between revisions of "Wurmpedia talk:Settlement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (line break) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
How about making two templates for displaying undeeded and unpopulated status? I'm thinking of something like s-nopop and s-nodeed. - [[User:Ketza|Ketza]] 12:11, 4 November 2007 (CST) | How about making two templates for displaying undeeded and unpopulated status? I'm thinking of something like s-nopop and s-nodeed. - [[User:Ketza|Ketza]] 12:11, 4 November 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
The boxes could look like this: [[User:Ketza/Settlement templates]] - [[User:Ketza|Ketza]] 12:35, 4 November 2007 (CST) | The boxes could look like this: [[User:Ketza/Settlement templates]] - [[User:Ketza|Ketza]] 12:35, 4 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 4 November 2007
We currently have some overloading of the settlement concept. The templates are currently used for three different cases:
- Populated, deeded area (Fort Mole)
- Unpopulated, deed area (Goblin Outpost)
- Populated, undeeded area (Shantytown)
Is this something to bother expanding on, or should we leave it to the advanced template to clarify deed status? - Dashiva 08:16, 4 November 2007 (CST)
How about making two templates for displaying undeeded and unpopulated status? I'm thinking of something like s-nopop and s-nodeed. - Ketza 12:11, 4 November 2007 (CST)
The boxes could look like this: User:Ketza/Settlement templates - Ketza 12:35, 4 November 2007 (CST)
