Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alternative Characters"
(Made this page after PM from un4) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
-un4 | -un4 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ok no worries, thats news to me. I was always under the impression that the devs didnt mind alts, of coarse if theyre not used for extra fighters etc. | ||
| + | --[[User:Benjo|Benjo]] 07:29, 20 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 20 November 2006
"However, it is frowned upon" - Is this just your opinion? Or did you hear this from a Dev? Because i dont think it is frowned upon. --Benjo 23:08, 15 November 2006 (CST)
Removed such information until confirmed. --Benjo 03:03, 17 November 2006 (CST)
Made this page after PM from un4
it's frowned upon, but we don't spend alot of time banning those who do it. Really depends on a lot of factors as to what the player is using the other account for. The large concern is for PvP advantages, such as fight training on yourself, or of course having that second fighter where you are...I hope this clears stuffs up some for you.
-un4
Ok no worries, thats news to me. I was always under the impression that the devs didnt mind alts, of coarse if theyre not used for extra fighters etc. --Benjo 07:29, 20 November 2006 (CST)
