Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Should abandoned villages and users really be put under "category:stub"? Doesn't feel like they belong here. --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should abandoned villages and users really be put under "category:stub"? Doesn't feel like they belong here. --[[User:Steffel|Steffe]] 17:20, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | Should abandoned villages and users really be put under "category:stub"? Doesn't feel like they belong here. --[[User:Steffel|Steffe]] 17:20, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Technically they are stubs, but it is true they're rather unlikely to be extended, and the value would be low. I'll fire up the bot if there are no objections to de-stubbing. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 03:44, 28 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 28 July 2007
Should abandoned villages and users really be put under "category:stub"? Doesn't feel like they belong here. --Steffe 17:20, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Technically they are stubs, but it is true they're rather unlikely to be extended, and the value would be low. I'll fire up the bot if there are no objections to de-stubbing. - Dashiva 03:44, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
