Wurmpedia talk:Settlement

From Wurmpedia
Revision as of 18:15, 15 December 2020 by NeeNee (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

We currently have some overloading of the settlement concept. The templates are currently used for three different cases:

  • Populated, deeded area (Fort Mole)
  • Unpopulated, deed area (Goblin Outpost)
  • Populated, undeeded area (Shantytown)

Is this something to bother expanding on, or should we leave it to the advanced template to clarify deed status? - Dashiva 08:16, 4 November 2007 (CST)

How about making two templates for displaying undeeded and unpopulated status? I'm thinking of something like s-nopop and s-nodeed. - Ketza 12:11, 4 November 2007 (CST)

The boxes could look like this: User:Ketza/Settlement templates - Ketza 12:35, 4 November 2007 (CST)

That's one option, but then we either need 4 copies of each (for kingdom/server combinations) or we lose the kingdom/server categorization for those settlements. That's why I think delegating to a second template set is probably better. - Dashiva 12:39, 4 November 2007 (CST)
I was thinking of a second template that you add under the old settlement template, Goblin Outpost would look like this. Does that look too crowded? - Ketza 12:47, 4 November 2007 (CST)