Talk:Natural Healing Items

I tried to move my notes to below shortass's table, but I could not get it to work. maybe someone else can make it work?

Also, it seems that there r mostly weak covers & a few strong. so we prolly only need to list the strong ones & say all the other combos r weak. That should make the table more managable than it's current size.

but we should leave the table until all combos have been tested so we know we have gotten them all. --Uzetaab 09:52, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

Great work! :D Keep it up! Awesome table. Can't wait till we've filled it up. --Helge 09:59, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

Anyone feel like colorcoding the table? Pretty difficult to understand at the moment. Joshu 10:27, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

Also, is it really neccessary for it to be symmetric across middle? Should probably eliminate half so it has less redundant content. Joshu 10:28, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

it's rather easy to make the table look nice, go here for the best way to do it, or go here for the easier way --Sppt 11:39, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

I've been trying to think of a way to remove the redundancies, but have not come up with a better sollution than only listing strong combos. if 1/2 the list is removed, it becmomes hard to see what all the options r for one item as u have to read a row & a column both. --Uzetaab 11:52, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

Uzetaab, i've putted in these colored rows so it is at least a bit better readable :) --Sppt 11:55, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

How about some definitons of strengths? I propose: 16 - Very strong 12 - Fairly strong 8 - Fairly weak 4 (does this exist?) - Very weak

~Sporhund 21:30, 14th June 2006 (GMT +1 DST)